What Can Cause the Baby to Put a Mother in a Life Threatening and Doctors Tell Her to Abort Baby
- Some medical experts counter Rep. Joe Walsh's statement
- OB-GYN group says abortions may be necessary to save female parent's life
- Walsh backed off his statement, citing "very rare circumstances"
Abortions are sometimes needed to relieve the lives or wellness of pregnant women, several medical experts said Friday, countering comments that were made and then partially retracted past Illinois Rep. Joe Walsh. Fifty-fifty a leading group opposing abortion, the National Right to Life Committee, issued a statement maxim that its position is "to allow abortion if necessary to prevent the death of the mother."
Walsh, who is seeking reelection, told reporters Thursday that "advances in science and technology," had eliminated any demand for abortions to salve the lives or health of women and said, "'Health of the female parent' has get a tool for abortions anytime, for any reason." On Fri, he backed off the statement somewhat, saying there are "very rare circumstances" in which the procedure is necessary to salvage a woman's life.
The American Higher of Obstetricians and Gynecologists issued a statement saying: "Abortions are necessary in a number of circumstances to save the life of a adult female or to preserve her health. Unfortunately, pregnancy is not a gamble-gratis life event."
Weather that might atomic number 82 to catastrophe a pregnancy to salve a woman'southward life include astringent infections, heart failure and severe cases of preeclampsia, a condition in which a adult female develops very high blood pressure level and is at take a chance for stroke, says Erika Levi, a obstetrician and gynecologist at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.
"There are certain cases where ending the pregnancy is the only option, cases where information technology would be putting the mother's life at adventure to continue the pregnancy," she says.
STORY:GOP rep backtracks on abortion comments
When a pregnancy must be ended before a fetus is feasible, "the effect is an abortion," says Vanessa Cullins, Vice President for External Medical Affairs for Planned Parenthood Federation of America. But she says there also are cases subsequently viability in which an abortion is safer than an induced childbirth or surgical delivery.
Cecily Kellogg, 44, a author who lives most Philadelphia, says that was the situation she faced when she was nearly six months pregnant with twin boys in 2004 and adult severe preeclampsia. 1 fetus had already died and "my liver had shut down, my kidneys had shut down and they were expecting me to start seizing at any infinitesimal," she says. The doctors said they had to quickly dilate her cervix and perform an abortion to save her. "I fought it," she says. "Just they told me I would die — that it was either me and my son or just my son."
She says it was a "horrible experience," but the right affair to do. She and her husband had a daughter in 2006. Her story is at her blog.
The National Right to Life Committee would non elaborate on its brief statement proverb abortions should exist immune if they are needed to salvage women'southward lives, said communications official Jessica Rogers. A more absolute view is expressed by the American Life League, a group opposing abortion which has a statement at its spider web site signed by 481 doctors who agree that: "There is never a state of affairs in the law or in the ethical exercise of medicine where a preborn child's life need be intentionally destroyed. ... A physician must practice everything possible to relieve the lives of both of his patients, mother and kid. He must never intend the death of either."
Cassing Hammond, an acquaintance professor of obstetrics and gynecology at Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, says cases in which doctors must decide whether information technology is rubber for a significant woman to evangelize a fetus in a medical crisis are complex and exterior the expertise of doctors who do not perform the procedures. He says he sees many such cases.
Most abortions are non for health reasons. The non-profit Guttmacher Institute says three-quarters of women having abortions say they can't afford a child, and an equal number say having a baby would interfere with work, schoolhouse and the ability to care for others, including existing children. A study published in Guttmacher's International Family Planning Perspectives in 1998 said risk to a woman's health was the chief reason for two.8% of U.S. abortions in 1987-88.
Annotation: An earlier version of this story incorrectly referred to Cassing Hammond as "she." Hammond is male. We apologize for the error.
Source: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2012/10/19/abortion-mother-life-walsh/1644839/
0 Response to "What Can Cause the Baby to Put a Mother in a Life Threatening and Doctors Tell Her to Abort Baby"
Post a Comment